Many of us were stunned by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s decision last August to prosecute former President Donald Trump and 18 co-defendants under Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Although I’m not a lawyer, it certainly seemed to be a rather novel, and highly partisan, application of a law that hitherto had been used to prosecute people engaged in organized crime. The indictment was also extraordinary because freedom of speech, which includes the right to question the results of an election, is guaranteed to us under the First Amendment.
At any rate, a motion filed last week by Georgia attorney Ashleigh Merchant — who represents co-defendant Michael Roman, a former Trump campaign official — alleges that Willis has engaged in an “improper, clandestine personal relationship” with Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor “who assisted in obtaining both grand jury indictments.” The filing states that Willis hired Wade without obtaining approval from the Fulton County Commission, which is required by state law. Therefore, according to the motion, “the entire prosecution is invalid and unconstitutional.”
The document alleges Willis hired Wade because she was romantically involved with him. In fact, their romantic relationship predates Wade’s hiring, according to the filing, which also alleges that Willis and Wade have benefited financially from the approximately $650,000 in compensation Wade has received for his services since January 2022. Wade has used his income to take Willis on lavish vacations to Napa, California, and to resorts in Florida and the Caribbean.
Perhaps the most important revelation is that Wade’s billing records show he met with investigators from the House Jan. 6 committee in April 2022, held a conference with the White House Counsel the following month, and conducted an eight-hour “interview with DC/White House” in November 2022. These charges raise questions about possible coordination between the Biden administration and state prosecutors in their targeting of Trump.
Wade’s qualifications for the job have also come under scrutiny. The Wall Street Journal reported that Wade has never tried a racketeering case, and, according to the filing, “There exists no record that Wade, a lawyer in private practice hired to lead the Trump case, has ever handled a felony trial in Georgia.”
It gets worse. According to the Wall Street Journal, just hours before Merchant filed her motion, Willis was served, at her office, with a subpoena to testify in Wade’s divorce case.
Merchant has called for the charges against Roman to be dismissed and for Willis and Wade to be recused from the case.
Heritage Foundation senior fellow Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission, noted this “ostensibly would mean that another prosecutor’s office would take over the case and put fresh eyes on the entire theory of prosecution.” He explained, “If the allegations are substantiated by the trial judge, Willis not only may have violated professional ethics rules but both state and federal law. The development could even jeopardize the validity of this prosecution.”
“If Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee grants Merchant’s motion as the presiding or trial judge, the disqualification would reach all of the defendants, including Trump, because the wrongdoing of which Willis is accused affects every defendant in the case,” von Spakovsky continued.
While the document contains no explicit evidence of the pair’s affair, it states that “sources close to both the special prosecutor and the district attorney have confirmed they had an ongoing, personal relationship.”
Merchant wrote she had “reviewed the case file in Wade’s ongoing divorce proceedings at the Superior Court Clerk’s Office and made copies of certain documents. But the divorce file was later improperly sealed because no court hearing was held as required by law.” She added that she has asked a judge to unseal the file and will share her findings once the seal has been lifted.
Willis broke her silence on these allegations in a 35-minute speech to parishioners at the Big Bethel AME Church in Atlanta on Sunday. Addressing her remarks to God, she predictably played the race card. Willis said she had hired a white woman, a white man, and a black man to prosecute the case but claimed the black man was the only one whose qualifications were being challenged. “God, isn’t it them who’s playing the race card when they only question one?” she asked.
Although she did not mention Wade by name, she defended the black man’s “impeccable credentials.” She said, “The black man I chose has been a judge for more than 10 years, runs a private practice more than 20 [years]. Represented businesses in civil litigation … served as a prosecutor, a criminal defense lawyer, special assistant attorney general.”
“I’m just asking, God, is it that some will never see a black man as qualified, no matter his achievements?” she continued.
It remains to be seen whether Willis’s self-serving remarks will help or hurt her. But clearly, the optics of the allegations against the pair look terrible.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
It will be up to McAfee to conduct a thorough review of the evidence presented and to render a decision. McAfee is a 34-year-old former prosecutor and inspector general who was appointed as a Fulton County Superior Court judge by Gov. Brian Kemp (R-GA) in February 2023, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The outlet notes that McAfee once “worked under Willis.” Friends described him as “driven and mild-mannered with conservative credentials.” I suppose we’ll see.
A court-ordered recusal from this case would certainly be a humiliating way for Willis’s 15 minutes of fame to come to an end. If the allegations turn out to be true, it would also be well deserved and long overdue. Hopefully, McAfee will take a load off Fani — and Wade as well.
Elizabeth Stauffer is a contributor to the Washington Examiner, Power Line, and AFNN, and she is a fellow at the Heritage Foundation Academy. She is a past contributor to RedState, Newsmax, the Western Journal, and Bongino.com. Her articles have appeared on RealClearPolitics, MSN, the Federalist, and many other sites. Please follow Elizabeth on X or LinkedIn.