Team Biden’s great double quarter pounder ‘misinformation’ campaign

.

Joe Biden
President Joe Biden arrives to speak about supply chain issues in the Indian Treaty Room on the White House complex in Washington, Monday, Nov. 27, 2023. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) Andrew Harnik/AP

Team Biden’s great double quarter pounder ‘misinformation’ campaign

TEAM BIDEN’S GREAT DOUBLE QUARTER POUNDER ‘MISINFORMATION’ CAMPAIGN. On Sept. 20, Politico published an article headlined “Biden’s campaign set to counterpunch on misinformation.” The story reported that President Joe Biden’s 2024 reelection campaign is “overhauling” its strategy to fight “misinformation” on social media. The new effort includes “recruiting hundreds of staffers and volunteers to monitor platforms.” To supervise the work, the campaign hired a former Biden White House staffer named Rob Flaherty, who was described as a “bulldog” and a “controversial figure” whose “combative emails to social media firms have become part of a Republican-led federal court case and a congressional investigation.”

That’s important. The federal court case is Missouri v. Biden, a landmark COVID-era case involving government censorship of social media. Discovery in the case brought revelations that the Biden White House and other Biden administration officials, working with outside activist groups, “held biweekly meetings with tech companies over how to curb the spread of misinformation during the pandemic,” with Flaherty “in constant contact with social media executives,” in the words of the Wall Street Journal editorial page.

The White House claimed it was just “flagging problematic posts … that spread disinformation.” But the Wall Street Journal continued: “Officials weren’t merely flagging false statements. They were bullying companies to censor anything contradicting government guidance.” Flaherty demanded that social media companies ban alleged offenders from big platforms like Facebook. After the companies’ initial hesitance, Flaherty and his administration colleagues got their way. “All 12 people dubbed the ‘Disinformation Dozen’ by the Center for Countering Digital Hate were censored, and pages, groups, and accounts linked to them were removed,” the Wall Street Journal said. Flaherty’s work also led to Twitter banning the vaccine skeptic writer Alex Berenson. And then: “The private intimidation was amplified by public threats to use antitrust action and regulation if tech companies didn’t follow orders,” the Wall Street Journal wrote.

Subscribe today to the Washington Examiner magazine that will keep you up to date with what’s going on in Washington. SUBSCRIBE NOW: Just $1.00 an issue!

An important fact to remember is that Flaherty and his colleagues weren’t just targeting misinformation. Many of the postings they sought to ban were “scientifically debatable,” in the Wall Street Journal’s words. What Flaherty and the Biden team really wanted to do was ban speech that was contrary to or inconvenient for Biden administration policy.

And now Flaherty has a new role at the Biden 2024 campaign. He moves into the job as his former colleagues at the White House have turned to a new topic, which is what alleged is misinformation about inflation. They believe it is rampant — the misinformation, that is — and they want to stamp it out.

You might think you are paying crazy high prices at the grocery store, at restaurants, and at the gas pump. You might also think you can’t afford to buy a house because of rising prices and high mortgage interest rates. You might think it’s also expensive not to buy a house, with rents going up and up. And you might have spent a lot, if not all, of your savings and have higher credit card balances than you used to.

From your personal experience, you might conclude that the economy is not doing well. What Rob Flaherty at the Biden campaign and the misinformation team at the White House want you to believe is that the economy, the Biden economy, is actually doing quite well. You’ve got it wrong. “The campaign is going to have to be more aggressive pushing back on misinformation,” Flaherty told Politico.

One of the first vehicles for this campaign is, of all things, a McDonald’s Smoky BLT Double Quarter Pounder with Cheese. This is what happened: In December of last year, a man ordered the sandwich, which was available only for a limited time, along with large fries and a large Sprite, at a McDonald’s in Post Falls, Idaho. The cost was $15.19, which, along with a 91-cent tax, made a final bill of $16.10. The man, Topher Olive, was unhappy and made a TikTok video to complain. “So I get there’s a labor shortage,” Olive said on the brief video. “I get there’s wage increases and a number of other things. But $16? $16 for a burger, a large fry, and a drink? It’s just crazy.”

The video went viral. It became the source of stories in some conservative media outlets. “These stories soon reached the White House office of Digital Strategy, which tracked the meme as one of many exaggerated examples of the nation’s economic woes,” wrote the controversial and oft-corrected Washington Post reporter Taylor Lorenz. “In reality, inflation has been steadily subsiding.” (Actually, in reality, it is more accurate to say that inflation “steadily subsiding” means that prices are still rising but at a slower rate than earlier.) And yet, amid what the White House sees as good news on the economy, “one anomalous price from one store in Idaho 11 months ago was ripping through people’s social media feeds as if it explained the entire economy,” Lorenz wrote.

The White House and Biden campaign want to push back against complaints like Olive’s. It’s important to note that the White House did not accuse Olive of misrepresenting the price of his meal. Olive included the receipt in the video, and he really did pay $16.10 for his Smoky BLT Double Quarter Pounder with Cheese, plus fries and a drink. But the Biden team worried about other people learning about the high-priced dinner, as if they somehow didn’t already know things are terribly expensive. (The Commerce Department recently reported that meals in limited-service restaurants were up 6.2% in October from the year before.) Now, Lorenz reports, the Biden White House is “working with social media platforms to counter misinformation.”

Does that sound familiar? It’s precisely how the White House described the work of Flaherty and his colleagues that resulted in Missouri v. Biden. During that time, as Politico reported, evidence showed that Flaherty “harangued employees at Facebook and YouTube when he was at the White House, insisting the companies do more to combat rhetoric against the Covid-19 vaccine. His aggressively worded messages have made him the target of conservative allegations that the White House and other Biden officials wrongly pressured private companies to take down internet speech.”

And remember, behavior like that came after the Biden 2020 campaign’s successful effort, again working with social media companies, to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story. Pressuring social media companies is something the group around the president has done very effectively. So now Team Biden is taking on “misinformation” about inflation. But here’s a problem for the White House: People have experienced Biden-era inflation in their own lives. They know what it has done to their finances. They don’t feel optimistic about an economy that has made it difficult for them just to get by. And no Biden effort to suppress discussion or attack “misinformation” will change what those people already know to be true.

For a deeper dive into many of the topics covered in the Daily Memo, please listen to my podcast, The Byron York Show, available on Radio America and the Ricochet Audio Network and everywhere else podcasts can be found.

© 2023 Washington Examiner

Related Content