
The FTC’s dishonest tactics against Elon Musk
Hudson Crozier
Video Embed
Elon Musk angered more than just āblue checkā liberal pundits when he took over Twitter last year. His imperfect but meaningful struggle to make it a place for freedom of expression has earned him endless wrath from the political establishment.
That includes President Joe Bidenās Federal Trade Commission, which quickly opened an investigation into Twitterās protection of user data after the takeover. Muskās legal team has released a court filing detailing its corrupt strategy to tear down the company.
TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY, OR THE MINORITY OF ONE
An employee at the consulting firm Ernst and Young testified that the FTC pressured employees to write a negative analysis of Twitterās data security methods. Bureaucrats made it clear that smearing Musk would be the predetermined outcome of the report, he said. The employee feared that the FTC would make āchallengesā for the company if it refused to write it.
Ironically, he made these statements during a deposition that was supposed to help the governmentās case. He resisted the FTCās attempts to downplay these bullying tactics through its line of questioning. āThis is absolutely what you will do, and this is going to occur, and youāll produce a report at the end of the day,ā he said while describing the agencyās aggression. He has no known reason to lie under oath about these interactions.
FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan, a Biden appointee, told lawmakers Thursday that there was no vendetta here. Demanding every internal communication about a companyās new owner is just a matter of holding corporations accountable, she said. But the FTCās mask fell off when it demanded the names of every journalist involved in the reporting of the “Twitter Files.” Muskās lawful sharing of internal materials with these reporters revealed the governmentās role in Big Tech censorship. The FTC cannot pretend as if targeting them has anything to do with ensuring user data privacy.
The Biden administration, including the president himself, and the Democrats have expressed outrage that Muskās rollback of censorship protocols has enabled āmisinformationā and given their political opponents more of a voice. They can’t stand that he took one of the governmentās censorship tools away and exposed what it had done with it, prompting scrutiny from Congress and the public. The FTC is the enforcement arm of this shameless retaliation, and it’s safe to add it to the list of politicized federal agencies.
People tend to call anything they don’t like “fascist.” These efforts to subjugate the private sector for the government’s political ends come dangerously close to fitting the description.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Hudson Crozier is a summer 2023 Washington Examiner fellow.