Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) has imposed America’s first statewide moratorium on new large data centers. Democrats in Congress are now calling for Washington to follow her lead, including demands for a national pause on new artificial intelligence infrastructure.
Their position is crystallizing: when data centers create political controversy, do not produce more electricity, modernize the grid, or establish predictable rules. Just stop building.
President Donald Trump took the opposite side. He called New York’s decision “terrible,” described data centers as future job engines and “Money Machines,” and warned the investment would simply relocate to another state or, eventually, to China. Data centers should have to pay for the power, water, and infrastructure they require. But America should still build them.
Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee ignored that warning. Facing protests in their own districts and pressure to act before the August recess, they rushed the Ratepayer Protection Act through committee, winning a unanimous 52-0 vote with Democratic support. That bipartisan unity should worry Republicans, not comfort them. Republicans just told voters the Democrats were right all along: that new AI infrastructure is first and foremost a threat to ratepayers, one that only a new federal regulatory regime can fix. Ranking member Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) took the win and asked for more, calling the bill “a good first step” while continuing to push for a nationwide moratorium.
The legislation does not impose a moratorium or bar data centers from connecting to the grid. Its stated purpose is to keep the costs of new, exceptionally large electricity users from being shifted onto families and small businesses.
But Republicans should recognize the larger political context. By giving Democrats a unanimous vote validating the idea that data centers are a threat to ratepayers, they risk legitimizing the campaign to stop construction altogether. No concession will appease those already demanding moratoria.
Democrats will next demand tighter restrictions, broader reviews, and new limits on water and electricity use. Each concession becomes the justification for the next restriction. The Ratepayer Protection Act is a Trojan horse for the Left’s environmental agenda, and Republicans just handed them the vehicle to drive it.
Hochul did not wait for improved cost-allocation rules or financial guarantees from developers. She imposed the country’s first statewide moratorium because of political pressure. That is where this movement is heading: not toward responsible development, but toward paralysis.
The timing could hardly be worse. China’s Moonshot AI just released Kimi K3, an open-weight model competing closely with leading American systems. Algorithms alone won’t win the AI race. Power plants, chips, and data centers will, and China is racing ahead on all three, while American politicians debate how many more obstacles to add.
Republicans must stop validating a political movement that will never be satisfied until America stops building entirely. Trump recognizes the United States is competing for the technological and economic leadership of the next century. Republicans must decide whether they will lead that race or manage America’s decline.
OPINION: WASHINGTON’S ANTI-CHINA TECH STRATEGY IS BUILT ON A DANGEROUS ILLUSION
That is not a hypothetical. I spent almost a decade on the Hill as chief of staff in the Senate and House, and I have seen this pattern before. An issue becomes a lightning rod, public pressure mounts, and Congress moves quickly with a hasty fix before recess. That is how bad policy gets made.
Building out America’s AI infrastructure is too important to rush. It will not be solved by lawmakers waving jars of brown water at hearings to generate outrage and social media clicks. The consequences of getting this policy wrong are simply too great.
Chuck Flint is the executive director of the Coalition for Affordability and Prosperity.