E. Jean Carroll, the woman who accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault, allegedly lied under oath during the trial. She claimed she was not receiving outside money to fund her cases — but as it turns out, left-wing megadonor Reid Hoffman was footing the bill.
This much has been known since 2023. What’s new is that the Department of Justice has rightfully opened a criminal investigation into the accuser.
Let’s take a moment to reevaluate her Trump rape accusation story, the details of which often get swept under the rug in favor of the ridiculous verdict.
WIKIPEDIA AND LEGACY MEDIA COMPETE TO OUT-BIAS EACH OTHER
Carroll, who once boasted about using a “trick” to sway jurors in the form of making herself look “f***able,” claims one of the most famous people in the world — a man who regularly dated supermodels — raped her, some random woman, in the lingerie department dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman store. She didn’t scream or call for help, she continued shopping at that store for years, and she didn’t publicly accuse Trump until over 20 years later — during the height of #MeToo movement and while he was making a run for reelection.
There were no eyewitnesses, no security footage, no police report, no medical records, and not even a sales receipt from the day in question. Trump even offered his DNA, but it was rejected from being used in the trial. Years after the alleged incident, Carroll described herself as a “big fan” of Trump’s show, The Apprentice, and joked about having sex with him for money on Facebook.
Several aspects of the story also changed over time. First, she said she never used the Bergdorf changing room after the alleged incident, then she said she had since used it. Second, she said the incident took place in late 1995 or early 1996, but could not recall the specific day, month, or year, then she miraculously remembered it was a Thursday evening in the spring of 1996.
Carroll’s story is also identical to a Law & Order episode about a character who — no joke — fantasized about a rape occurring in the dressing room of Bergdorf Goodman’s lingerie department involving a powerful man. Carroll herself admitted the so-called “amazing coincidence” was “astonishing.”
So with all of that said, I’m not buying it. Common sense precludes me from believing her story.
This same woman, after Trump was first elected, literally discussed a “scheme” to “do our patriotic duty” via email with Carol Martin, who just so happened to corroborate Carroll’s story on the witness stand. Martin called Trump’s victory an “apocalypse” and said, “something has to happen to stop the train.” Add in Hoffman’s funding — from the man who spent millions attempting to prevent a second Trump presidency — and we have a full-blown conspiracy on our hands.
Why would Carroll hide the fact that Hoffman was funding her cases? The answer is obvious: it would expose the whole thing as a partisan attempt to take down the president. Say what you want about the numerous ballot inconsistencies during the 2020 election — perhaps the best case that the election was stolen comes from the coordinated efforts from the media and Hoffman’s domain of Big Tech to portray Trump in a negative light while shielding former President Joe Biden from controversy. Case in point: The widespread censoring of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
The media has a diminished but still strong impact on public opinion in 2026; however, go back to 2019 and 2020, and its credibility and thus its ability to sway voters was significantly greater.
Here’s how left-wing rag, the Daily Beast, framed its headline about the Carroll DOJ investigation: “Trump Goons Launch Sick Revenge Plot Against His Sex Attack Victim.”
WHAT HAPPENED TO WIKIPEDIA’S NEUTRALITY?
That’s not even billed as an opinion piece; it’s supposedly straight news. Enforcing the law when Carroll pretty clearly lied under oath is not a “sick revenge plot,” and any serious person familiar with the facts of the case would not refer to Carroll as Trump’s “sex attack victim.”
Thankfully, nobody takes the legacy media — much less fringe outlets like the Daily Beast — seriously these days. Like Carroll’s apparent Law & Order-inspired rape fantasy, we should all roll our eyes at such stories.