Yale University’s radical defense of their clear liberal bias, antisemitism, and constitutional violations, coupled with their attack of conservative news outlets, proves the institution has lost the public’s trust.
“Campus Reform’s business model appears simple: scrape stories from student newspapers and university press releases, attach modified images with menacing faces and darkened rooms and repackage them as evidence of “liberal bias,” Race and Ethnicity Professor Daniel Martinez Song wrote in an op-ed for Yale Daily News.
‘ANTI-RACIST’ YALE HOSTS A CHEERLEADER FOR JEW-KILLING AND RACIAL HATRED
“Writers are not expected to report or investigate. Campus Reform will pay them and give them a byline simply for feeding the machine,” Song added.
Song’s misleading accusations follow a Campus Reform report revealing that Yale University’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors hosted a meeting with Ivy League faculty and administrators to discuss President Donald Trump’s higher education initiative, a potential Title IX investigation, and the possibility of a federal funding freeze.
The professor’s reaction toward the outlet that exposed the meeting underscores the growing unease among university staff, who have faced increasing scrutiny since President Trump’s second term began over alleged constitutional violations and the persistence of antisemitic behavior on campus.
“AAUP at Yale University hosted a panel on Sept. 29 where faculty leaders from several Ivy League schools discussed how universities can organize in response to federal scrutiny and possible funding cuts stemming from the Trump administration’s Title VI investigations,” Campus Reform wrote in their October 8 report.
“The president of Yale’s own AAUP chapter said the event was important because even though the university has until now been spared from loss of federal funding, it was important to think “about what could be on the horizon,” the media outlet added.
According to The College Fix, in recent years Yale’s anti-Israel movement—made up of dozens of student and faculty groups, an elected student government that voted to boycott Israel in 2024, and complicit administrators—has created an environment where antisemitic harassment of Jewish students is tolerated. The university’s willingness to enable such behavior exposes a deep-seated hostility toward the Jewish and Israeli community.
“The ceasefire is simply a pause for the oppressor to recover its public relations, domestic fractures, and the economy before its next iteration of occupation. The Zionist entity has not changed its genocidal intent since Zionism’s inception over a century ago. So long as the Zionist entity continues to occupy Palestine, maintaining an apartheid government and normalizing the slow killing of Palestinian’s, the student intifada will continue its necessary existence,” Yalies 4 Palestine, a pro-Hamas student organization at Yale, wrote on social media.
If the antisemitism wasn’t bad enough, Yale has also been guilty of violating the law in multiple instances, such as Title IX, which prohibits gender based discrimination, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits race-based discrimination.
YALE REMOVES STATUS FROM SJP CHAPTER OVER ‘ANTISEMITIC CONDUCT’ ON SHORT LIVED ENCAMPMENT
Yale’s conduct, mirrored by dozens of other elite institutions including Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania, and Northwestern University, has triggered a nationwide backlash, leading to a major freeze in federal funding, multiple Department of Justice investigations, and the resignation of several high-ranking administrators.
Yale is now running out of time to sign President Trump’s Higher Education Compact, which would require the university to freeze tuition for five years, cap international undergraduate enrollment, strengthen enforcement of biological gender definitions, and restrict athletic participation based on gender identity. The agreement would also mandate reforms to Yale’s governance to prevent policies that “punish, belittle, or incite violence against conservatives,” and prohibit the university from charging undergraduates majoring in the hard sciences, given its endowment exceeding $2 billion.