‘Toxic masculinity’ was a mistake. Now Democrats are paying the price

.

Democrats are discovering something on the campaign trail that conservatives have been saying for years: Men want to know that being a man still means something.

That discovery comes at an interesting time.

The Associated Press reported that masculinity has become an undercurrent in several important 2026 Senate races. Democratic candidates are trying to project toughness, defend themselves against Republican attacks on their masculinity, and offer their own definition of what it means to be a man. 

James Talarico, the Democratic Senate nominee in Texas, offers the clearest example.

After Republicans questioned his masculinity, Talarico responded by talking about his adoptive father, who would mow his own lawn and then mow the lawn of an elderly neighbor. Talarico’s lesson was simple: “A real man takes responsibility.” He later added, “Real men serve others.” 

Good.

Seriously. Good.

Responsibility, service, family, and sacrifice are exactly what young men need to hear.

But Democrats should ask themselves why these virtues suddenly sound politically useful.

For years, the public conversation about masculinity has too often focused on what is wrong with men. Traditional male traits such as competitiveness, strength, and confidence have frequently been discussed mainly in terms of how they can become harmful. The phrase “toxic masculinity” became a shorthand for talking about the dangers of male behavior.

Now that election season has arrived, Democrats are discovering that men want to feel respected.

Men can tell the difference between being respected and being marketed to.

The problem is not that Democrats are talking about masculinity. They should. The problem is trying to rediscover masculinity without acknowledging the damage done when a generation of men is taught that many of the traits associated with manhood are things they should be suspicious of.

Masculinity is not simply a candidate’s image.

It is responsibility.

Responsible fatherhood matters. Self-discipline matters. Competition matters. Working hard and earning your place in the world matters. Wanting to provide for your family matters. Wanting to succeed so you can help your friends, your relatives, and your community matters.

So does sacrifice.

A father who stays when leaving would be easier is practicing a form of masculinity. A young man who learns to control his impulses, keeps his word, and works to build a future is practicing it. A man who works hard so his children have opportunities he never had is practicing it.

None of that is toxic.

These are the habits that build families, communities, and, ultimately, a country.

We have spent too much time explaining how masculinity can go wrong and not enough time explaining what healthy masculinity is supposed to produce.

Men need something worth becoming.

They need to know that their strength can be useful to someone besides themselves. They need to know that discipline can lead to achievement, achievement can create security, and security can give them the ability to care for other people.

They need to know that sacrifice is not weakness.

Sometimes sacrifice is love.

This is why Talarico’s comments are so revealing. His definition of manhood — responsibility, family, and service — is not controversial. Conservatives have been making that case for generations.

But there is a larger question Democrats should answer: Why should men believe this new message is more than a campaign strategy?

Young men don’t need politicians to tell them that masculinity is acceptable.

They need a culture that gives masculinity a purpose.

They need fathers who believe their presence matters. They need schools and communities that expect discipline from them. They need opportunities to work, compete, and build something of their own. They need families that tell them their strength is not something to suppress, but something to direct toward a purpose.

And they need to hear that becoming a good man is not about dominating other people.

It is about becoming someone other people can depend on.

That is the masculinity worth defending.

BREAD LINES OR BREAD WINNING? THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY’S FATAL LEFTWARD DRIFT

Democrats may discover that version of masculinity helps them win some elections. But men deserve more than another campaign strategy.

They deserve to know that becoming a responsible man still matters — not because a politician needs their vote, but because their families and communities need them to become the kind of men who can be counted on.

David Sypher Jr. is a conservative writer from Rahway, New Jersey. 

Related Content