Supreme Court to review if inmate can sue over lack of medical help after prison riot

.

The Supreme Court will weigh whether an inmate can sue prison officials for allegedly not giving adequate medical treatment following a prison riot, a possibly key case for determining the scope of prisoners’ Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishments.

The high court announced that it will hear the case Nielsen v. Watanabe in its next term. It was the only case in Monday’s order list that the justices announced they would add to their docket for their upcoming term.

The case centers on an inmate, Kekai Watanabe, who was involved in a riot at a federal prison in July 2021. After the riot was broken up, prison officials documented his visible injuries, but later that day, Watanabe reported headaches and feelings of pain to prison officials. He was given “over-the-counter pain medication” but was denied by officials when he requested to go to the hospital. Watanabe was later diagnosed with a fractured coccyx, and he filed a lawsuit against prison officials in federal court.

Watanabe’s lawsuit was dismissed by a federal district court, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that he had a valid claim, the same as in the Supreme Court’s 1980 case Carlson v. Green. In the Carlson ruling, the Supreme Court recognized a prisoner’s Eighth Amendment claim against prison officials for not attending to a prisoner’s medical needs after an inmate suffered an asthma attack, instead exacerbating it and leading to his death hours later.

The Supreme Court in recent decades has declined to expand the ability to file such claims outside of those specific circumstances and is being asked, in Watanabe’s lawsuit, whether his case is “meaningfully different” from the claims in the Carlson case. The high court’s decision is expected to have ramifications regarding the extent to which prisoners can sue prison officials for a lack of medical treatment.

The Watanabe case is expected to be heard sometime between October 2026 and April 2027, with a decision due by the end of June 2027 at the latest.

SUPREME COURT EXPANDS GUN RIGHTS FOR MARIJUANA USERS

The Supreme Court is slated to wrap up its current term over the next week, when it issues the remaining 17 opinions in cases it heard over the past several months. Some of the most closely watched cases awaiting a ruling include legal challenges to Trump’s firing ability, a pair of state laws barring biological men from women’s sports, and laws allowing late-arriving mail ballots to be counted.

The high court has stated it will release opinions on Tuesday and Thursday, but could still add additional opinion days this week or next week.

Related Content