For years, Washington met Georgia’s democratic decline with familiar language: concern, warnings, diplomatic statements. The result was always the same. Nothing changed. The ruling Georgian Dream party kept consolidating power, independent institutions weakened, and ties with the United States frayed. Now Congress has decided concern is no longer enough.
On June 8, the House passed H.R. 7668, the Countering China’s Control of the Caucasus Act. The law does not issue another statement. It imposes a deadline: within 180 days, U.S. intelligence agencies must deliver Congress a classified report mapping Russian, Chinese, and Iranian intelligence operations inside Georgia and how deeply they have penetrated the state.
That distinction matters. Political statements get filed and forgotten. Intelligence findings enter the permanent record of the U.S. government and shape policy for years. And one figure many analysts expect will attract particular scrutiny is Bidzina Ivanishvili, the billionaire widely regarded as Georgia’s most powerful man, even though he holds no office. If U.S. intelligence examines the networks that have shaped Georgia’s trajectory over the past decade, it will be difficult to avoid examining his role.
FAR LEFT IS ‘EXPANDING’ IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY: GUY BENSON
Americans should care because of where Georgia sits. The country is a strategic corridor between Europe, Russia, the Black Sea, and the Middle East — a transit route for energy and trade that the United States has spent two decades helping anchor to the West. Georgians have repeatedly poured into the streets waving European flags. A Georgia quietly pulled back into Moscow’s orbit, or opened to Beijing’s, would be a direct setback for American interests in a region where Washington has real stakes.
Transparency International Georgia describes Ivanishvili as the architect of one of the most complete cases of state capture in the post-Soviet space — the subordination of parliament, the courts, the security services, and the media to one private individual. When then-U.S. Ambassador Robin Dunnigan needed to address Georgia’s direction, the consequential conversations centered on Ivanishvili, not the prime minister. As Georgian diplomat Vano Machavariani put it: “The majority of people in the world know that the government is run by Bidzina Ivanishvili.” Whether that influence reflects ordinary political power or something deeper is precisely why Congress ordered an intelligence review.
The questions about him begin in Moscow. Ivanishvili made his fortune in Russia during the chaotic privatization of the 1990s, among the oligarchs who financed Boris Yeltsin’s re-election. He has acknowledged personally funding the 1996 campaign of General Alexander Lebed, a Soviet-era figure tied to the deadly 1989 crackdown in Tbilisi. The late Kremlin critic Boris Berezovsky once said Ivanishvili “plays by the rules of Russia’s government” and therefore “has no problems in Russia.” Former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili has claimed Ivanishvili kept a Gazprom stake after saying he had sold his Russian assets — a charge Ivanishvili denies.
More telling are the accounts from former insiders. Eldar Gogoladze, Ivanishvili’s onetime security chief, said in a 2020 interview that before investing in Georgia’s strategic Anaklia deep-sea port, Ivanishvili insisted on traveling to Moscow for the personal approval of Nikolai Patrushev, then Russia’s security council secretary. “If I don’t get his blessing, I won’t invest a single dollar,” Gogoladze quoted him as saying. The project was frozen. When entrepreneur Mamuka Khazaradze later revived Anaklia with American partners, he says Ivanishvili asked him directly: “What do the Americans want in the Black Sea?” The project ultimately collapsed, while Chinese state-linked interests later emerged as major contenders in Georgia’s port sector — a strategically vital Western-backed project lost, and an opening for Beijing.
Soso Gogashvili, a former deputy head of the State Security Service, has alleged from prison that in 2016, on Ivanishvili’s instructions, he traveled to Vladikavkaz to meet a Russian FSB general. His own former driver confirmed on camera, in a TV Pirveli investigation, that he drove him to that meeting. Gogashvili has also turned over files he describes as classified and alleged that Russian contraband moved through Georgia toward Syria. Officials deny it, and Gogashvili sits in prison on unrelated charges. Whether those claims withstand scrutiny is precisely what Congress has now tasked U.S. intelligence to determine.
The pattern runs through Ivanishvili’s circle. Otar Partskhaladze, a former prosecutor general tied to him through a godparent bond Ivanishvili publicly confirmed, was sanctioned by the U.S. as an FSB asset. He then changed his surname to “Romanov,” took Russian citizenship, and now appears at Kremlin events in Moscow. These are not allegations; they are documented. Transparency International Georgia has also documented continued family ties to Russia: real estate near Moscow, an active Russian passport held by Ivanishvili’s eldest son, and income from Moscow property routed through VTB Bank, a sanctioned Russian state institution.
Washington has already acted. In December 2024, the Treasury Department sanctioned Ivanishvili for undermining Georgia’s democracy and Euro-Atlantic future in Russia’s interest. U.S. sanctions have since expanded to senior officials in his governing system, including those who oversaw the violent dispersal of pro-Western protesters. The European Union, United Kingdom, and Baltic states followed. The contrast with Europe’s earlier posture is striking: in 2020, France awarded Ivanishvili the Legion of Honor, its highest decoration. One Western capital honored him; another sanctioned him four years later.
Then there is the spectacle on K Street. Even as the sanctions mounted, the Georgian government spent millions from its state budget on Washington lobbying firms — including DCI Group AZ, Hogan Lovells, and Chartwell Strategy Group — according to Foreign Agents Registration Act filings. The money bought nothing: it did not stop the sanctions, the visa restrictions, or H.R. 7668. And here is the irony American taxpayers can appreciate — those lobbying firms pay U.S. taxes that help fund American intelligence. Through that chain, Georgia’s rulers are helping bankroll the very investigation now closing in on them.
DEMOCRATS FEAR MAINE SWING DISTRICT ‘OFF THE BOARD’ AFTER MATT DUNLAP VICTORY
I do not write this to pronounce a verdict. After a career in Georgia’s security institutions, including counterintelligence work focused on Russian operations, I know the difference between rumor and pattern — and what surrounds Ivanishvili is a pattern. Whether it amounts to what his critics fear is exactly what the next 180 days are meant to establish.
When the report reaches Congress, it will either dispel allegations that have shadowed Georgian politics for over a decade or confirm them. Either outcome matters far beyond one man. It will help decide whether a nation that keeps declaring its Western future in the streets is allowed to claim it. Congress has started the clock. In 180 days, Washington may learn whether its concerns about Georgia were understated all along.
Emzari Gelashvili is a former member of the Georgian Parliament (2008–2012) and a former senior official in Georgia’s Ministry of State Security, Ministry of Defense, and Ministry of Internal Affairs, with a counterintelligence background focused on Russian and Iranian operations. He is a geopolitical analyst based in San Francisco.