A bitter generational battle is unfolding in California’s 7th District primary race, pitting an 81-year-old incumbent against a 40-year-old newcomer in one of the state’s bluest seats.
The fight between Rep. Doris Matsui (D-CA), an icon of the Democratic establishment who has held the seat for 21 years, and Sacramento City Councilmember Mai Vang has quickly escalated into a personal and policy-driven feud, with both candidates openly criticizing one another as the primary intensifies.
Vang has framed her campaign around urgency and generational change, arguing Matsui is disconnected from everyday voters and lacks the energy needed to address the concerns of working families.
“I would say age is obvious, but that’s not the only factor, ” Vang said in an interview with SFGATE. “It’s about a sense of urgency, a sense of urgency to meet the needs of working families.”
Matsui, a longtime party powerbroker who has recently come under scrutiny, has forcefully pushed back.
While acknowledging the importance of bringing in younger voices, she has rejected the notion that age determines effectiveness.
“I think that we need younger representation,” Matsui said. “By the way, we have a lot in Congress as it is right now. But here’s my perspective: Judge me on my work and not my birth certificate.”
First elected in 2005 following the death of her husband, former Rep. Robert Matsui (D-CA), the Sacramento congresswoman is part of a political lineage that has held the seat for nearly half a century. Though she secured reelection comfortably in 2024, signs of frustration have emerged within the district, including a tense town hall in October where constituents voiced dissatisfaction with her responses and policy positions.
Inside the Elks Lodge No. 6 auditorium in Greenhaven last year, Matsui was met with boos from voters who were not happy that she allegedly fumbled or gave canned responses to several questions, refused to stop accepting donations from a pro-Israel political group, and did not acknowledge concerns that she had “ducked her district.” She also got into a clash with an audience member over wealth and “privilege.”
Vang has since highlighted that discontent, criticizing Matsui’s limited town halls and calling for more direct interaction with constituents. Matsui, in turn, has defended her outreach, citing ongoing meetings and her office’s work, while dismissing Vang’s critiques as uninformed. She, however, has declined to commit to hosting any further town halls.
“I meet with constituents all the time, and so does my staff,” Matsui said. “I think they are the most active staff around. I’m very active. She doesn’t know what I do.”
The race has also drawn attention from Democratic leadership. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who recently announced she will not seek reelection after decades in Congress, has voiced support for cultivating younger leaders but continues to back Matsui, emphasizing the value of experience. She showed up at the California Democratic Convention to endorse Mastui. Vang criticized Pelosi’s endorsement, claiming that a non-district member speaking on a candidate’s behalf violated regional caucus rules. Despite the controversy, Matsui secured the party endorsement. That has not stopped Vang from pushing forward with her campaign as the candidates head into the June 2 primary.
Policy differences have further fueled the divide between Vang and Matsui.
Vang backs eliminating Immigration and Customs Enforcement and favors both a federal wealth tax, an idea championed by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), and a state-level wealth tax initiative. Vang is also a proponent of the single-payer healthcare system.
While Matsui supports higher taxes for billionaires, she does not endorse Khanna’s wealth tax plan or the state initiative. She has not advocated to dissolve ICE and does not back Medicare for All.
“Universal healthcare is what we need, but the path there is complicated,” Matsui said.
Vang says her decision to run solidified after a meeting with Matsui in August which she sought stronger action on immigration enforcement under President Donald Trump. Vang claimed she asked Matsui about it and was dissatisfied by her answer.
“About 15 minutes into the meeting, I had asked what her position on immigration was and she turned to her staff and asked, ‘What is our position on immigration?’ In that moment was when I realized that we didn’t have the leadership that we needed to protect our families,” Vang said.
Matsui has vehemently denied that exchange happened, accusing Vang of “completely distorting the facts of that.”
She also claimed the meeting was spent discussing a gubernatorial pardon for a family member of Vang.
Vang, in turn, denied that account of the conversation, saying she was asking about someone from the Hmong community.
California-based political expert Jay Chickney told the Washington Examiner that the fight unfolding shows just how frustrated voters are with the old guard.
GAVIN NEWSOM’S TAX MYTHS VS. CALIFORNIA’S REALITY
“Matsui has been around for a long time,” he said. “Yes, it’s definitely an age thing. She’s been in Congress for two decades. It’s time for new blood and the voters feel it.”
Calls to both Matsui and Vang by the Washington Examiner for comment were not returned.