It has been just over a year since the 2024 elections, and Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) continues to prove that voters were right to reject him and the terrible presidential candidate who thought he would make a good vice president.
The liberal media dam has broken open on the widespread fraud regarding Minnesota’s government spending, with even the New York Times now joining the dogpile. The fraud has been rampant through Minnesota’s homeless programs, healthcare initiatives, and COVID-19 funding, driven largely by organized fraud schemes from members of the state’s Somali community. In response to the fraud, Walz has said Minnesota is a “generous state” that “attracts criminals.”
We broke this story wide open with our investigation. Then Trump took action and forced the Dems, Tim Walz, and New York Times to react. Now the story is dominating national headlines. pic.twitter.com/3wHa1X9I20
— Christopher F. Rufo
(@christopherrufo) December 1, 2025
BESSENT ORDERS TREASURY INVESTIGATION INTO POSSIBLE DIVERSION OF MINNESOTA TAX DOLLARS TO TERRORISTS
He then falsely said it is a “well-run state,” as a well-run state that knows its policies wouldn’t attract criminals and would do a better job overseeing the massive welfare programs that Walz has allowed to be defrauded.
Walz is an incompetent executive, but he is also a morality-policing hypocrite. When President Donald Trump posted on social media about the story, he called Walz a dated slur for intellectually disabled people, an obviously unbecoming remark from a president. Walz proceeded to overreact, handwringing about how “we have fought three decades to get this [language] out of our school” and that “this is what Donald Trump has done. He’s normalized this type of hateful behavior and this type of language.”
Let’s just run through the past year of comments from the moral paragon that is Walz: He called Elon Musk a “dips***,” bragged that he could “kick most of their a**” when talking about Trump supporters, and openly celebrated the idea that Trump could possibly be dead and eagerly promised his depraved supporters that “there will be news sometime” that Trump will die.
To borrow Walz’s comments about Trump’s rhetoric, “I think it’s just because he’s not a good human being, but secondly to distract from his incompetency.”
CAIR SPINS ANTI-ISRAEL NARRATIVE ABOUT SOMALI FRAUD AS SCRUTINY GROWS
Walz is wildly incompetent, as both a politician (as he showed by somehow being a worse campaigner than former Vice President Kamala Harris) and as a governing executive. He is a hypocrite who gives lectures on morality one moment and cheers the possible death of his political opponents the next. In all, Walz is one of the worst people in our politics, someone who would run both the government and our political culture (further) into the ground, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
Whatever way the next three years play out, voters were right to reject putting Walz a heartbeat away from the presidency. They were right to reject Harris, whose judgment is so terrible that she thought putting Walz a heartbeat away from the presidency was a good idea. And Minnesota voters will have a chance to make that same good decision next year, when they can oust Walz and elect someone who won’t let their state be defrauded of hundreds of millions of dollars while trying to lecture the country about moral values they do not hold.