AOC’s Met Gala saga that led to ethics office saying she may have violated federal law

.

The 2021 Met Gala Celebrating In America: A Lexicon Of Fashion - Street Sightings
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) attends the 2021 Met Gala Celebrating In America: A Lexicon Of Fashion at the Metropolitan Museum Of Art on Sept. 13, 2021, in New York City. Ray Tamarra/GC Images

AOC’s Met Gala saga that led to ethics office saying she may have violated federal law

Video Embed

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has come under renewed scrutiny over her attendance at the Met Gala in 2021, resulting in an ethics complaint that accuses her of possibly violating federal law.

The House Ethics Committee announced on Thursday it would be extending its investigation into Ocasio-Cortez’s conduct at the event after the Office of Congressional Ethics revealed it had found “substantial reason to believe that she accepted impermissible gifts.” If found to be true, the New York congresswoman would be in violation of House rules and possibly federal law, according to the report.

AOC MAY HAVE VIOLATED LAW WITH MET GALA APPEARANCE, HOUSE ETHICS OFFICE SAYS

Here’s a breakdown of the allegations Ocasio-Cortez faces and how she has responded to the widespread scrutiny.

AOC dons ‘Tax the Rich’ dress at 2021 Met Gala 

Ocasio-Cortez first attracted widespread criticism after attending the Met Gala in 2021 while donning a white dress with the words “Tax the Rich” written in red on the back.

However, the New York Democrat came under increased scrutiny after vendors voiced complaints that her office had not made the necessary payments for Ocasio-Cortez’s hair, makeup, and wardrobe services, which amounted to thousands of dollars. The OCE later opened an inquiry into the matter in December, although the office did not disclose the parameters of the investigation at the time.

Ocasio-Cortez has since paid for the outstanding costs for her attire and services for the Met Gala event, but those payments only came after the New York congresswoman was notified officials would be reviewing her conduct, according to a report from the OCE.

Delayed payments could qualify as ‘impermissible gifts,’ posing violation

Although Ocasio-Cortez eventually made the required payments, the OCE referred the matter to the House Ethics Committee for an investigation in June. Acting ranking member Susan Wild (D-PA) decided to take up the matter in December.

House rules bar members from accepting gifts that have “monetary value,” including items that are categorized as “gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, [or] forbearance.”

Because Ocasio-Cortez delayed payments for her dress and accessories, which she rented for the event, as well as her hair and makeup services, conservative watchdog groups are pressing House lawmakers to investigate whether that amounts to “impermissible gifts.”

“Despite various efforts to address compliance concerns in advance of the Met Gala through counsel, and despite representations to the Committee regarding compliance with House rules, it appears several thousands of dollars’ worth of services may have remained unpaid absent the OCE initiating this review,” OCE wrote in its report.

AOC defends conduct, says she’s confident matter will be dropped

Ocasio-Cortez responded to the criticism, acknowledging that the payments were delayed despite the congresswoman taking “several steps to ensure nothing of this nature will happen again.” However, the oversight does not amount to a violation of House rules, her office said.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“While regrettable, these delayed payments definitively do not rise to the level of a violation of House Rules,” spokespeople for Ocasio-Cortez told the Washington Examiner. “Even after OCE’s exhaustive review of the congresswoman’s personal communications, there is no record of the congresswoman refusing to pay for these expenses.”

Ocasio-Cortez ultimately made the necessary payments, handling the expenses with her “own personal funds,” according to her office. The congresswoman has also expressed confidence the matter would be dismissed without charges.

© 2023 Washington Examiner

Related Content